On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: > print_bpf_insn() was treating all BPF_ALU[64] the same, but BPF_END has a > different structure: it has a size in insn->imm (even if it's BPF_X) and > uses the BPF_SRC (X or K) to indicate which endianness to use. So it > needs different code to print it. > > Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ec...@solarflare.com>
well, it's an improvement over what we have today, so Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
