On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:52:41 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote: > > + return ((ret != 0) ? false : true); > > But I don't think this is a problematic line from my understanding,
Why not: return ((ret != 0 == true) ? false : true) == true; ? Sigh. This is equal to: return !ret; which you should use. Jiri