Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:13:51PM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>Instead of calling u32_lookup_ht() in a loop to find
>a unused handle, just switch to idr API to allocate
>new handles. u32 filters are special as the handle
>could contain a hash table id and a key id, so we
>need two IDR to allocate each of them.
>
>Cc: Chris Mi <chr...@mellanox.com>
>Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
>Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
>---
[...]
>@@ -311,19 +313,19 @@ static void *u32_get(struct tcf_proto *tp, u32 handle)
> return u32_lookup_key(ht, handle);
> }
>
>-static u32 gen_new_htid(struct tc_u_common *tp_c)
>+static u32 gen_new_htid(struct tc_u_common *tp_c, struct tc_u_hnode *ptr)
> {
>- int i = 0x800;
>+ unsigned long idr_index;
>+ int err;
>
>- /* hgenerator only used inside rtnl lock it is safe to increment
>+ /* This is only used inside rtnl lock it is safe to increment
> * without read _copy_ update semantics
> */
>- do {
>- if (++tp_c->hgenerator == 0x7FF)
>- tp_c->hgenerator = 1;
>- } while (--i > 0 && u32_lookup_ht(tp_c, (tp_c->hgenerator|0x800)<<20));
>-
>- return i > 0 ? (tp_c->hgenerator|0x800)<<20 : 0;
>+ err = idr_alloc_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, ptr, &idr_index,
>+ 1, 0x7FF, GFP_KERNEL);
Interesting, any idea why this is not 0x7FFFFFFF as well?
I wonder if we could have 0x7FFFFFFF magic defined somewhere.
Otherwise, "patchset" looks good. Thank you for taking care of this!
