> > > > Your example shows there's GPIO phandle *and* specifier.
> > >
> > > Would "GPIO specifier" be enough here?
> >
> > No, specifier is the cells following GPIO (or any other) phandle.
>
> So this should be "GPIO phandle and specifier of ...", is that correct?
>
> I have found very few (< 4) occurrences of this language in (lots of)
> '-gpios'
> property descriptions under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/. Is this a new
> requirement?
Sometimes it is just easier to refer to another document:
GPIO, as defined in Documentation/devicetree/binding/gpio/gpio.txt
Andrew
