On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:40:30PM -0400, Michael Chan wrote:
> If we cannot allocate RX buffers in the NAPI poll loop when processing
> an RX event, the current code does not count that event towards the NAPI
> budget.  This can cause us to potentially loop forever in NAPI if we
> consistently cannot allocate new buffers.  Improve it by counting
> -ENOMEM event as 1 towards the NAPI budget.
>
> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.c...@broadcom.com>
Thanks for fixing it.

Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index 1afb408..a34fcdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -1850,6 +1850,13 @@ static int bnxt_poll_work(struct bnxt *bp, struct 
> bnxt_napi *bnapi, int budget)
>                                                          &event);
>                       if (likely(rc >= 0))
>                               rx_pkts += rc;
> +                     /* Increment rx_pkts when rc is -ENOMEM to count towards
> +                      * the NAPI budget.  Otherwise, we may potentially loop
> +                      * here forever if we consistently cannot allocate
> +                      * buffers.
> +                      */
> +                     else if (rc == -ENOMEM)
> +                             rx_pkts++;
>                       else if (rc == -EBUSY)  /* partial completion */
>                               break;
>               } else if (unlikely((TX_CMP_TYPE(txcmp) ==
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

Reply via email to