On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 19:00 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Part 8 of 8 to add wireless statistics to the bcm43xx-d80211 system.
> This patch adds the appropriate range parameters and routine
> ieee80211_get_wireless_stats to ieee80211_ioctl.c.
> 
> The patch is for the August 8 version of Linville's wireless-dev tree.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> diff --git a/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c b/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
> index dd52555..3a1b97f 100644
> --- a/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
> @@ -1525,6 +1525,16 @@ static int ieee80211_ioctl_giwrange(stru
>       range->min_frag = 256;
>       range->max_frag = 2346;
> 
> +     range->max_qual.qual = 100;
> +     range->max_qual.level = 152;  /* set floor at -104 dBm (152 - 256) */
> +     range->max_qual.noise = 152;
> +     range->max_qual.updated = IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED;
> +
> +     range->avg_qual.qual = 50;
> +     range->avg_qual.level = 0;
> +     range->avg_qual.noise = 0;
> +     range->avg_qual.updated = IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED;
> +
>       return 0;
>   }
> 
> @@ -2963,6 +2973,39 @@ static int ieee80211_ioctl_giwauth(struc
>       return ret;
>   }
> 
> +/* Get wireless statistics.  Called by /proc/net/wireless and by 
> SIOCGIWSTATS */
> +static struct iw_statistics *ieee80211_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device 
> *net_dev)
> +{
> +     struct ieee80211_local *local = net_dev->ieee80211_ptr;
> +     struct iw_statistics * wstats = &local->wstats;
> +     struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(net_dev);
> +     struct sta_info *sta;
> +     static int tmp_level = 0;
> +     static int tmp_qual = 0;
> +
> +     sta = sta_info_get(local, sdata->u.wds.remote_addr);
> +     if (!sta) {
> +             wstats->discard.fragment = 0;
> +             wstats->discard.misc = 0;
> +             wstats->qual.qual = 0;
> +             wstats->qual.level = 0;
> +             wstats->qual.noise = 0;
> +             wstats->qual.updated |= IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED;

What does the 'if (!sta)' check do?  What's the case here?  If the card
is not connected an access point or otherwise unconnected to anything
else, you should use IW_QUAL_ALL_INVALID here I think, because signal
quality has no meaning when you're disconnected (except possibly
background noise).

> +     } else {
> +             if (!tmp_level) {       /* get initial values */
> +                     tmp_level = sta->last_signal;
> +                     tmp_qual = sta->last_rssi;
> +             } else {                        /* smooth results */
> +                     tmp_level = (15 * tmp_level + sta->last_signal)/16;
> +                     tmp_qual = (15 * tmp_qual + sta->last_rssi)/16;
> +             }
> +             wstats->qual.level = tmp_level;
> +             wstats->qual.qual = 100*tmp_qual/sta->max_rssi;
> +             wstats->qual.noise = sta->last_noise;
> +             wstats->qual.updated = IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED | IW_QUAL_DBM;

By using IW_QUAL_DBM, you're forcing all cards that use d80211 to report
statistics in dBm.  I think that's a _good_ thing personally (it brings
some consistency to the whole wireless quality pit-of-doom), but I want
to make sure this is actually what you want to do here.

Dan

> +     }
> +     return wstats;
> +}
> 
>   static int ieee80211_ioctl_siwencodeext(struct net_device *dev,
>                                       struct iw_request_info *info,
> @@ -3128,4 +3171,5 @@ const struct iw_handler_def ieee80211_iw
>       .standard       = (iw_handler *) ieee80211_handler,
>       .private        = (iw_handler *) ieee80211_private_handler,
>       .private_args   = (struct iw_priv_args *) ieee80211_ioctl_priv,
> +     .get_wireless_stats = ieee80211_get_wireless_stats,
>   };
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to