On 8/27/17 3:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 21:18:37 +0200
> 
> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Did coccinelle trip on the message or the fact you weren't returning NULL?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>   drivers/connector/cn_queue.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c b/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> index 1f8bf054d11c..e4f31d679f02 100644
> --- a/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> @@ -40,10 +40,8 @@ cn_queue_alloc_callback_entry(struct cn_queue_dev *dev, 
> const char *name,
>       struct cn_callback_entry *cbq;
>   
>       cbq = kzalloc(sizeof(*cbq), GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!cbq) {
> -             pr_err("Failed to create new callback queue.\n");
> +     if (!cbq)
>               return NULL;
> -     }

Wny not:

        if (!cbq) {
                pr_err("Failed to create new callback queue.\n");
+               return NULL;
        }

>   
>       atomic_set(&cbq->refcnt, 1);
>   
> 

Reply via email to