* Ville Nuorvala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-09 12:42 > Ok, it might require quite big changes to the existing code, but if > someone is willing to take a look at it I wouldn't be against it :-)
I'll provide a patch soon. > You know, I'm starting to think we could perhaps get rid of > ip6_null_entry altogether. I at least don't really see any good reason > to keep it after such changes. > > This would apply even more strongly to the new ip6_prohibit_entry and > ip6_blk_hole_entry as they don't even serve as routing table dummy entries. Absolutely, that's the whole point from my perspective, they're only holding an error code and somewhat hiding error handling. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
