On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:24:28 +0000 "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter" <peter.waskiewicz...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/17 5:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> > >> Tested with Intel XL710 NIC with Cisco 3172 switch. > >> > >> It would be even slightly better if the irqbalance service is turned > >> off outside. > > > > Yes, if you don't turn-off (kill) irqbalance it will move around the > > IRQs behind your back... > > Or you can use the --banirq option to irqbalance to ignore your device's > interrupts as targets for balancing. It might be worth mentioning that --banirq=X is specified for each IRQ that you want to exclude, and --banirq is simply specified multiple times on the command line. Is it possible to tell a running irqbalance that I want to excluded an extra IRQ? (just before I do my manual adjustment). -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
