On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:03:04PM +0800, Lin Zhang wrote:
> In function {ipv4,ipv6}_synproxy_hook we expect a normal tcp packet,
> but the real server maybe reply an icmp error packet related to the 
> exist tcp conntrack, so we will access wrong tcp data.
> 
> For fix it, we simply pass IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY packets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lin Zhang <xiaolou4...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_SYNPROXY.c  | 2 +-
>  net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_SYNPROXY.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_SYNPROXY.c 
> b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_SYNPROXY.c
> index f1528f7..3971fd9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_SYNPROXY.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_SYNPROXY.c
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_synproxy_hook(void *priv,
>       if (synproxy == NULL)
>               return NF_ACCEPT;
>  
> -     if (nf_is_loopback_packet(skb))
> +     if (nf_is_loopback_packet(skb) || ctinfo == IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY)

If the intention is to inspect TCP traffic only, I would suggest you
just check for the protocol field here instead. So we are sure we only
deal with TCP traffic indeed.

Thanks.

Reply via email to