From: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:01:39 +0100
> Is there anything to stop me using RTNLGRP_NOP3 for that? (suitable > renamed of course!) So far as I can see its never been assigned to > anything else... I have no objection to you using it. These nops exist because the table used to be a bunch of bitmask defines instead of the present enum: #define RTMGRP_LINK 1 #define RTMGRP_NOTIFY 2 #define RTMGRP_NEIGH 4 #define RTMGRP_TC 8 #define RTMGRP_IPV4_IFADDR 0x10 #define RTMGRP_IPV4_MROUTE 0x20 #define RTMGRP_IPV4_ROUTE 0x40 #define RTMGRP_IPV6_IFADDR 0x100 #define RTMGRP_IPV6_MROUTE 0x200 #define RTMGRP_IPV6_ROUTE 0x400 #define RTMGRP_DECnet_IFADDR 0x1000 #define RTMGRP_DECnet_ROUTE 0x4000 That is from 2.4.x - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
