Em Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 08:36:18PM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov escreveu: > Hello! > > > This fix goes against the old historical comments about UNIX98 semantics > > but without this fix SOCK_DGRAM is broken and useless. So either ANK's > > interpretation was incorect or UNIX98 standard was wrong. > > Just found this reference to me. :-) > > The comment migrated from tcp.c. It is only about connected SOCK_STREAM > sockets, I do not see how it can make SOCK_DGRAM broken or useless.
Its just that the work to get the AF_LLC code closer to the AF_INET structure was suspended before the SOCK_STREAM code was separated from the SOCK_DGRAM one, moving PF_LLC to sk->sk_prot-> land, so the comment is indeed about SOCK_STREAM part, not DGRAM. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
