On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 16:27:17 PDT Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Actually, it is safe even without the check. Overflow of the signed integer > is benign here.
Usually, it's a bad idea to allow UB to happen. Where is the overflow? I didn't see it in the patches so far. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
