On 07/26/2017 01:15 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:59:49 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
@@ -418,6 +420,8 @@ static void test_bpf_obj_id(void)
nr_id_found++;
err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(prog_fd, &prog_info, &info_len);
+ prog_infos[i].jited_prog_insns = 0;
+ prog_infos[i].xlated_prog_insns = 0;
Can you elaborate why this one above is needed?
Ah, I removed the comment about it at the last minute. The check below
compares the info we get here with info we got reading the programs in
the earlier loop - using memcmp().
Yep, makes sense. I mistook it for 'length' given it is not NULL but 0,
but that is due to __aligned_u64. ;) Anyway, thanks for clarifying.
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>