Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:35:43AM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>From: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
>
>Generic bitflags attribute content sent to the kernel by user.
>With this type the user can either set or unset a flag in the
>kernel.
>
>The nla_value is a bitmap that defines the values being set
>The nla_selector is a bitmask that defines which value is legit.
>
>A check is made to ensure the rules that a kernel subsystem always
>conforms to bitflags the kernel already knows about. i.e
>if the user tries to set a bit flag that is not understood then
>the _it will be rejected_.
>
>In the most basic form, the user specifies the attribute policy as:
>[ATTR_GOO] = { .type = NLA_BITFIELD_32, .validation_data = &myvalidflags },
>
>where myvalidflags is the bit mask of the flags the kernel understands.
>
>If the user _does not_ provide myvalidflags then the attribute will
>also be rejected.
>
>Examples:
>nla_value = 0x0, and nla_selector = 0x1
>implies we are selecting bit 1 and we want to set its value to 0.
>
>nla_value = 0x2, and nla_selector = 0x2
>implies we are selecting bit 2 and we want to set its value to 1.Oh, 2 more things: [...] >@@ -46,6 +60,13 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int >maxtype, > return -ERANGE; > break; > >+ case NLA_BITFIELD_32: Now that I'm looking at it, perhaps just "NLA_BITFIELD32" looks nicer and aligns with "NLA_U32" and others. >+ if (attrlen != sizeof(struct nla_bitfield_32)) >+ return -ERANGE; >+ >+ return validate_nla_bitfield_32(nla, pt->validation_data); >+ break; Remove the pointless "break" from here.
