On 7/13/17 2:33 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > Remains where? It's not clear to me how you concluded mlxsw is at fault. > My setup is running net-next with the refcount patches and I didn't > observe this.
Create a VRF. see latest patch. mlxsw releasing the refcnt on the rule was the victim; eric's patch to fix a delete was setting the refcnt to 1 after mlxsw bumped it.
