On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:01:02AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:55:39AM CEST, l...@kernel.org wrote:
> >From: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
> >
> >Device (dev) object represents struct ib_device to the user space.
> >
> >Device properties:
> > * Device capabilities
> > * FW version to the device output
> > * node_guid and sys_image_guid
> > * node_type
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
> >---
> > rdma/Makefile |   2 +-
> > rdma/dev.c    | 235 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > rdma/rdma.c   |   3 +-
> > rdma/rdma.h   |  12 ++-
> > rdma/utils.c  |  46 +++++++++++-
> > 5 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 rdma/dev.c
> >
> >diff --git a/rdma/Makefile b/rdma/Makefile
> >index 64da2142..123d7ac5 100644
> >--- a/rdma/Makefile
> >+++ b/rdma/Makefile
> >@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ include ../Config
> >
> > ifeq ($(HAVE_MNL),y)
> >
> >-RDMA_OBJ = rdma.o utils.o
> >+RDMA_OBJ = rdma.o utils.o dev.o
> >
> > TARGETS=rdma
> > CFLAGS += $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) libmnl --cflags)
> >diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 00000000..b80e5288
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/rdma/dev.c
> >@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
> >+/*
> >+ * dev.c    RDMA tool
> >+ *
> >+ *              This program is free software; you can redistribute it 
> >and/or
> >+ *              modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> >+ *              as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
> >+ *              2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> >+ *
> >+ * Authors:     Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
> >+ */
> >+
> >+#include "rdma.h"
> >+
> >+static int dev_help(struct rdma *rd)
> >+{
> >+    pr_out("Usage: %s dev show [DEV]\n", rd->filename);
> >+    return 0;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void dev_print_caps(struct nlattr **tb)
> >+{
> >+    uint64_t caps;
> >+    uint32_t idx;
> >+
> >+    /*
> >+     * FIXME: move to indexes when kernel will start exporting them.
> >+     */
> >+    static const char *dev_caps[64] = {
>
>       static const char *dev_caps[] = {

The same as for the "link" object.

>
>
> >+            "RESIZE_MAX_WR",
> >+            "BAD_PKEY_CNTR",
> >+            "BAD_QKEY_CNTR",
> >+            "RAW_MULTI",
> >+            "AUTO_PATH_MIG",
> >+            "CHANGE_PHY_PORT",
> >+            "UD_AV_PORT_ENFORCE",
> >+            "CURR_QP_STATE_MOD",
> >+            "SHUTDOWN_PORT",
> >+            "INIT_TYPE",
> >+            "PORT_ACTIVE_EVENT",
> >+            "SYS_IMAGE_GUID",
> >+            "RC_RNR_NAK_GEN",
> >+            "SRQ_RESIZE",
> >+            "N_NOTIFY_CQ",
> >+            "LOCAL_DMA_LKEY",
> >+            "RESERVED",
> >+            "MEM_WINDOW",
> >+            "UD_IP_CSUM",
> >+            "UD_TSO",
> >+            "XRC",
> >+            "MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS",
> >+            "BLOCK_MULTICAST_LOOPBACK",
> >+            "MEM_WINDOW_TYPE_2A",
> >+            "MEM_WINDOW_TYPE_2B",
> >+            "RC_IP_CSUM",
> >+            "RAW_IP_CSUM",
> >+            "CROSS_CHANNEL",
> >+            "MANAGED_FLOW_STEERING",
> >+            "SIGNATURE_HANDOVER",
> >+            "ON_DEMAND_PAGING",
> >+            "SG_GAPS_REG",
> >+            "VIRTUAL_FUNCTION",
> >+            "RAW_SCATTER_FCS",
> >+            "RDMA_NETDEV_OPA_VNIC",
> >+    };
> >+

<...>

> >+    if (!tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_FW_VERSION])
> >+            return;
> >+
> >+    pr_out("fw %s ",
> >+           mnl_attr_get_str(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_FW_VERSION]));
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void _dev_print_be64(char *name, uint64_t val)
>
> Why the initial "_"? I think it could be avoided.
>
> Wait, I'm confused. Does kernel actually exposes BE64 in U64 attribute?
> That is wrong. Please fix it while there is still a time (if it is).

It was, I fixed it in the last version of my RDMA netlink patches as a
response to Jason's comment.

The "_be64" suffix in the name is a leftover from dark ages. I'll fix it.

>
>
> >+{
> >+    uint16_t vp[4];
> >+
> >+    memcpy(vp, &val, sizeof(uint64_t));
> >+    pr_out("%s %04x:%04x:%04x:%04x ", name, vp[3], vp[2], vp[1], vp[0]);
> >+}
> >+

<...>
>
>
> >+    }
> >+    else {
>
> "} else {"
>
> Checkpatch should warn you. Did you run it?
>

Partially.

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to