On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:35:23PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > mdio_mux_init parses the child nodes of the MDIO mux. When using > "mdio-mux-mmioreg" the child nodes are describing the register value > that is written to switch between the MDIO busses. > > The change which makes the error messages more verbose changed the > parsing of the "reg" property from a simple of_property_read_u32 call > to of_mdio_parse_addr. On a Khadas VIM (based on the Meson GXL SoC, > which uses mdio-mux-mmioreg) this prevents registering the MDIO mux > (because the "reg" values on the MDIO mux child nodes are 0x2009087f > and 0xe40908ff) and leads to the following errors: > mdio-mux-mmioreg c883455c.eth-phy-mux: > /soc/periphs@c8834000/eth-phy-mux/mdio@e40908ff PHY address -469169921 is too > large > mdio-mux-mmioreg c883455c.eth-phy-mux: Error: Failed to find reg for child > /soc/periphs@c8834000/eth-phy-mux/mdio@e40908ff > mdio-mux-mmioreg c883455c.eth-phy-mux: > /soc/periphs@c8834000/eth-phy-mux/mdio@2009087f PHY address 537462911 is too > large > mdio-mux-mmioreg c883455c.eth-phy-mux: Error: Failed to find reg for child > /soc/periphs@c8834000/eth-phy-mux/mdio@2009087f > mdio-mux-mmioreg c883455c.eth-phy-mux: Error: No acceptable child buses > found > mdio-mux-mmioreg c883455c.eth-phy-mux: failed to register mdio-mux bus > /soc/periphs@c8834000/eth-phy-mux > (as a result of that ethernet is not working, because the PHY which is > connected through the mux' child MDIO bus, which is not being > registered). > > Fix this by reverting the change from of_mdio_parse_addr to > of_mdio_parse_addr.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> Yes, validating the reg property needs to be done separately in each user of the generic mdio-mix code. The reg for the gpio mux must be <= number of gpios, mmioreg must be somewhere within the address space, bcm-iproc < 1024? Jon, please feel free to add such code. Andrew