On 7/4/17, 3:14 PM, "Daniel Borkmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 07/04/2017 11:51 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> The function load_bpf_file ignores the return value of
> load_and_attach(), so even if load_and_attach() returns an error,
> load_bpf_file() will return 0.
>
> Now, load_bpf_file() can call load_and_attach() multiple times and some
> can succeed and some could fail. I think the correct behavor is to
> return error on the first failed load_and_attach().
Your SOB is missing.
Oops, thanks. New patch forthcoming.
