There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: <sparcli...@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_32.h | 5 -----
arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h | 5 -----
2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_32.h
b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_32.h
index 8011e79f59c9..67345b2dc408 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_32.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_32.h
@@ -14,11 +14,6 @@
#define arch_spin_is_locked(lock) (*((volatile unsigned char *)(lock)) != 0)
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->lock, !VAL);
-}
-
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
__asm__ __volatile__(
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
index 07c9f2e9bf57..923d57f9b79d 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
#define arch_spin_is_locked(lp) ((lp)->lock != 0)
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->lock, !VAL);
-}
-
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
unsigned long tmp;
--
2.5.2
