On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:39:09PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Simon Horman > <simon.hor...@netronome.com> wrote: > > > This patchset is in two parts. > > > > The first 9 patches add code to allow representors to be instantiated > > etc... The remaining patches provide the beginning of a flower app which > > makes use of this infrastructure. So I think there is a clear separation > > between representor code, in .../nfp/ and app code that uses representors, > > in this case .../nfp/flower/. > > indeed, got it. > > > I could have supplied a test app to demonstrate using representors - and > > that is really what the flower app is as of this patchset. But I chose to > > name it flower as it we have follow-up work to make the app actually > > offload flower and at that point that will be come its dominant feature. > > As you stated, the separation is there. If got you right, it will be possible > to > use representors in non flower apps, and probably also possible to have > the flower app used in a non-SRIOV environment, just fine.
Yes, that is correct.
