Hi Daniel, > > Sorry, had a travel over the weekend, so didn't read it in time. > > What is the issue with imitating in JIT what the interpreter is > doing as a starting point? That should be generic enough to handle > any case. > > Otherwise you'd need some sort of reverse mapping since verifier > already converted BPF_CALL insns into relative helper addresses > in imm part. > Sorry but I don't get what you are trying to say. Can you explain it with an example?
-Shubham
