This change does not effect to tcpdump, only let UDP filter can not
received UDP datagrams with checksum error. It is not a good idea, but
I think is the best way to resolve this problem. If you want to capture
error UDP packet, you can used tcpdump.
On Monday 31 July 2006 04:57, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> | if (!sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {
> |
> | IPv6 doesn't do this, so I think delete condition 'sk->sk_filter'
is
> | better. Do you think so?
>
> I think the sk->sk_filter is there for a good reason. If you delete
it,
> that routine is forced to always compute UDP checksums, even if the
only
> receiving application is a tcpdump process. I may be wrong here, but I
> think that deleting the sk_filter statement is not at a good idea.
>
> The other alternatives discussed (afaik) so far were:
>
> 1) Move the increment of UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS from udp_queue_rcv_skb()
to
> udp_recvmsg() (first patch uploaded to
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6660). This was discussed:
not a
> good idea, since in-kernel applications may use the data_ready handler
> rather than udp_recvmsg().
>
> 2) Decrement UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS in udp_recvmsg() when the checksum
turns
> out to be wrong (second patch uploaded to above address). This would
be a
> fix to the problem you are stating, it also solves the problem of
missing
> out the data_ready handlers in (1), and was suggested earlier on this
> mailing list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
