On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Cong.
>>
>> how about in ip_check_mc_rcu():
>> for (psf = im->sources; psf; psf = psf->sf_next) {
>> if (psf->sf_inaddr == src_addr)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> I didn't see spinlock for it, is it safe to access them in parallel ?
>> or these two places would never be in parallel ?
>
> That is a different bug which needs more work, therefore
> I defer it to net-next. And I already explained to you why
> it needs more work than just a call_rcu().
Okay, thanks Cong.
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
