On 6/8/17 10:30 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.

The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
has different expectation on jited_prog_len.

This patch also removes the pwd.h header which I forgot
to remove after making changes.

Fixes: 95b9afd3987f ("bpf: Test for bpf ID")
Reported-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index 8189bfc7e277..fec13ab84fca 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ typedef __u16 __sum16;
  #include <sys/wait.h>
  #include <sys/resource.h>
  #include <sys/types.h>
-#include <pwd.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
  #include <linux/err.h>
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ static void test_bpf_obj_id(void)
        const __u32 array_key = 0;
        const int nr_iters = 2;
        const char *file = "./test_obj_id.o";
+       const char *jit_sysctl = "/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable";
struct bpf_object *objs[nr_iters];
        int prog_fds[nr_iters], map_fds[nr_iters];
@@ -305,9 +306,18 @@ static void test_bpf_obj_id(void)
        struct bpf_map_info map_infos[nr_iters + 1];
        char jited_insns[128], xlated_insns[128];
        __u32 i, next_id, info_len, nr_id_found, duration = 0;
-       int err = 0;
+       int sysctl_fd, jit_enabled = 0, err = 0;
        __u64 array_value;
+ sysctl_fd = open(jit_sysctl, 0, O_RDONLY);
+       if (sysctl_fd != -1) {
+               char tmpc;
+
+               if (read(sysctl_fd, &tmpc, sizeof(tmpc)) == 1)
+                       jit_enabled = (tmpc != '0');
+               close(sysctl_fd);
+       }
+
        err = bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id(0);
        CHECK(err >= 0 || errno != ENOENT,
              "get-fd-by-notexist-prog-id", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno);
@@ -339,13 +349,14 @@ static void test_bpf_obj_id(void)
                if (CHECK(err ||
                          prog_infos[i].type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER ||
                          info_len != sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info) ||
-                         !prog_infos[i].jited_prog_len ||
+                         (jit_enabled && !prog_infos[i].jited_prog_len) ||
                          !prog_infos[i].xlated_prog_len,
                          "get-prog-info(fd)",
-                         "err %d errno %d i %d type %d(%d) info_len %u(%lu) 
jited_prog_len %u xlated_prog_len %u\n",
+                         "err %d errno %d i %d type %d(%d) info_len %u(%lu) 
jit_enabled %d jited_prog_len %u xlated_prog_len %u\n",
                          err, errno, i,
                          prog_infos[i].type, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
                          info_len, sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info),
+                         jit_enabled,
                          prog_infos[i].jited_prog_len,
                          prog_infos[i].xlated_prog_len))
                        goto done;

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>

Reply via email to