On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:04:39PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The mv88e6xxx driver accesses a port's netdev mostly for printing.
>
> This is bad for 2 reasons: DSA and CPU ports do not have a netdev
> pointer; it doesn't give us a correct picture of why a DSA driver might
> need to access a port's netdev.
>
> Introduce mv88e6xxx_{dbg,err,warn} macros to print messages with a
> prefix containing the real switch name (not the compatible one),
> as well as the switch and port indexes.
Hi Vivien
I agree with the principle, but wonder about the naming. We have some
stuff which is not per port, but at the chip level. It would be nice
to have a similar set of helpers, but which only take chip. So maybe
we want to call these mv88e6xxx_port_{dbg, err, warn} and later add
mv88e6xxx_chip_{dbg, err, warn}.
Andrew
