From: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:00:43 -0700
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:56:58PM +0800, 严海双 wrote: >> >> > On 8 Jun 2017, at 12:38 PM, Alexei Starovoitov >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:32:44PM +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote: >> >> When __ip6_tnl_rcv fails, the tun_dst won't be freed, so call >> >> dst_release to free it in error code path. >> >> >> >> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> >> >> Fixes: 8d79266bc48c ("ip6_tunnel: add collect_md mode to IPv6 tunnels") >> >> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <[email protected]> >> > >> > I don't get it. Why did you send another version of the patch? >> > What was wrong with previous approach that myself and Eric acked? >> > >> > >> >> Sorry for your confusing, because Pravin Shelar give a feedback in ipv4 >> patch, see below: > > hmm. right. > Then it raises the question: How did you test this and previous patch? > > since previous version was sort-of fixing the bug, but completely > breaking the logic... Anyone who posts new patches this patch isn't testing things thoroughly at all.
