On Tue, 30 May 2017 13:47:55 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2017 11:37:22 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote: > > This code is also hit via the OVS path, and i don't see a problem with > > your changes and analysis but i am not too familiar with the ovs call > > path. I see that the relevant developers are CC'ed. > > I don't see a problem with ovs and this patch. Ovs calls > rtnl_delete_link. > > I'd prefer to have the code in a vxlan_vs_del_dev function to be > symmetrical with vxlan_vs_add_dev similarly to what Roopa suggested. If > you keep me in CC while resending I'll be happy to add my ack to the > patch.
I replied to a wrong email in the thread but I guess it's obvious what I wanted to reply to :-) Sorry for that, Jiri
