From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>

With the introduction of chain goto action, the reclassification would
cause the re-iteration of the actual chain. It makes more sense to restart
the whole thing and re-iterate starting from the original tp - start
of chain 0.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 01a8b8b..89fbb35 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -300,7 +300,8 @@ int tcf_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct 
tcf_proto *tp,
        __be16 protocol = tc_skb_protocol(skb);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
        const int max_reclassify_loop = 4;
-       const struct tcf_proto *old_tp = tp;
+       const struct tcf_proto *orig_tp = tp;
+       const struct tcf_proto *first_tp;
        int limit = 0;
 
 reclassify:
@@ -315,9 +316,10 @@ int tcf_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct 
tcf_proto *tp,
                err = tp->classify(skb, tp, res);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
                if (unlikely(err == TC_ACT_RECLASSIFY && !compat_mode)) {
+                       first_tp = orig_tp;
                        goto reset;
                } else if (unlikely(TC_ACT_EXT_CMP(err, TC_ACT_GOTO_CHAIN))) {
-                       old_tp = res->goto_tp;
+                       first_tp = res->goto_tp;
                        goto reset;
                }
 #endif
@@ -335,7 +337,7 @@ int tcf_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct 
tcf_proto *tp,
                return TC_ACT_SHOT;
        }
 
-       tp = old_tp;
+       tp = first_tp;
        protocol = tc_skb_protocol(skb);
        goto reclassify;
 #endif
-- 
2.9.3

Reply via email to