From: [email protected] Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:45:11 +0800 > From: Gao Feng <[email protected]> > > When the new RFS table size specified by sysctl equals the old one, > there is nothing changed actually. So it is unnecessary to reset the > RFS table entris. > > Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <[email protected]>
It seems like an intentional feature to be able to reset the table by simply writing the same value to the sysfs knob. I'm not applying this, sorry.
