From: gfree.w...@vip.163.com Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:45:11 +0800 > From: Gao Feng <gfree.w...@vip.163.com> > > When the new RFS table size specified by sysctl equals the old one, > there is nothing changed actually. So it is unnecessary to reset the > RFS table entris. > > Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.w...@vip.163.com>
It seems like an intentional feature to be able to reset the table by simply writing the same value to the sysfs knob. I'm not applying this, sorry.
