On 05/15/2017 04:09 PM, David Miller wrote: > Please, no. > > The reason we put together a method by which glibc and the kernel can > stay out of eachother's way in header files is exactly so that we > don't need ifdefs that conditionally do netinet/in.h vs. using the > kernel header. > > There are more than a dozen other UAPI headers which make use of > linux/in6.h and none of them jump through hoops like what is being > proposed here, and that's on purpose. > > So special casing this one one header is really not the way to go.
Mmmh it's true that special casing in kernel headers for a user space issue is not the best way to go.. I'll find a way to solve this in user space only. Sorry about the lousy patch. David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
