On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: >>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:48 PM, kernelci.org bot <b...@kernelci.org> wrote: >>> >>> int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op, >>> >>> This commit is not marked 'Cc: stable' upstream, but is referenced >>> in the one that was backported and looks like it might be appropriate >>> for stable as well. Eric, can you clarify? >>> >> >> Hi Arnd >> >> Yes, it looks like stable would need this small extract from 158f323b9868, >> removing the parameter from sock_edemux macro > > Ok, and the rest of 158f323b9868 should not go into stable, right? >
I do not believe this is a stable candidate. A stable candidate coming from me would have a Fixes: tag
