On 5/15/17 4:29 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 5/15/17 4:21 PM, Tobias Jungel wrote:
Thanks Sabrina and Nik.
On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 14:01 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
Hi Tobias,
2017-05-15, 13:08:19 +0200, Tobias Jungel wrote:
Currently it is allowed to set the default pvid of a bridge to a
value
above VLAN_VID_MASK (0xfff). This patch checks the passed pvid and
disables the pvid in case it is out of bounds.
Could we return an error (-EINVAL) to userspace instead? Silently
disabling the feature seems confusing to me. This would probably be
better in br_validate() (like the IFLA_BR_VLAN_PROTOCOL check), since
there's already such a check when setting default_pvid from sysfs (in
br_vlan_set_default_pvid()).
I will send a v2 that returns -EINVAL. br_validate seems to be the
wrong place to me since it deals with the bridge ports.
Could you elaborate ? br_validate should be called for all and is a very good
suggestion.
I meant for the bridge newlink/changelink of course. :-)
Reproduce by calling:
[root@test ~]# ip l a type bridge
[root@test ~]# ip l a type dummy
[root@test ~]# ip l s bridge0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
[root@test ~]# ip l s bridge0 type bridge vlan_default_pvid 9999
[root@test ~]# ip l s dummy0 master bridge0
[root@test ~]# bridge vlan
port vlan ids
bridge0 9999 PVID Egress Untagged
dummy0 9999 PVID Egress Untagged
You'll also need to add a Signed-off-by, and a Fixes tag would be
nice.
Right, will add this as well.
Thanks,
