On 5/12/17 6:03 PM, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com>
> 
> Every address gets added with TENTATIVE flag even for the addresses with
> IFA_F_NODAD flag and dad-work is scheduled for them. During this DAD process
> we realize it's an address with NODAD and complete the process without
> sending any probe. However the TENTATIVE flags stays on the
> address for sometime enough to cause misinterpretation when we receive a NS.
> While processing NS, if the address has TENTATIVE flag, we mark it DADFAILED
> and endup with an address that was originally configured as NODAD with
> DADFAILED.
> 
> We can't avoid scheduling dad_work for addresses with NODAD but we can
> avoid adding TENTATIVE flag to avoid this racy situation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index b09ac38d8dc4..53f2dc092023 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1022,7 +1022,10 @@ ipv6_add_addr(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct 
> in6_addr *addr,
>       INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ifa->addr_lst);
>       ifa->scope = scope;
>       ifa->prefix_len = pfxlen;
> -     ifa->flags = flags | IFA_F_TENTATIVE;
> +     ifa->flags = flags;
> +     /* No need to add the TENTATIVE flag for addresses with NODAD */
> +     if (!(flags & IFA_F_NODAD))
> +             ifa->flags |= IFA_F_TENTATIVE;
>       ifa->valid_lft = valid_lft;
>       ifa->prefered_lft = prefered_lft;
>       ifa->cstamp = ifa->tstamp = jiffies;
> 

LGTM.

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to