On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 06:50:04PM +0200, Ursula Braun wrote: > Please consider the following patch to make users aware of the > security implications through existing mechanisms.
Any such patch would be in addition to the BROKEN marker until there is an actual alternative. > + rmb_desc->mr_rx[SMC_SINGLE_LINK] = > + lgr->lnk[SMC_SINGLE_LINK].roce_pd->__internal_mr; And it's named __internal_mr for reason. The right interface to use the unsafe rkey is to use pd->unsafe_global_rkey.
