On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:19:55AM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:06:11 +0400
>
> > Receiving side, nor matter if it is socket or netchannel, will drop
> > packets (socket due to queue overfull, netchannels will not drop, but
> > will not ack (it's maximum queue len is 1mb)).
> >
> > So both approaches behave _exactly_ the same.
> > Did I miss something?
>
> Socket will not drop the packets on receive because sender will not
> violate the window which receiver advertises, therefore there is no
> reason to drop the packets.
How come?
sk_stream_rmem_schedule(), sk_rmem_alloc and friends...
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
