Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:17:18PM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Andreas Bardoutsos <[email protected]>
>---
>Hi all!
>
>I have added a dump function(always return true) to recognise RPL extension
>header(RFC6553)
>Otherwise packet was dropped by kernel resulting in failing communication in
>RPL DAG's between
>linux running border routers and devices in the graph.For example
>communication
>with contiki OS running devices was previously impossible.
>
> include/uapi/linux/in6.h | 1 +
> net/ipv6/exthdrs.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/in6.h b/include/uapi/linux/in6.h
>index 46444f8fbee4..5cc12d309dfe 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/in6.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/in6.h
>@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct in6_flowlabel_req {
> #define IPV6_TLV_CALIPSO 7 /* RFC 5570 */
> #define IPV6_TLV_JUMBO 194
> #define IPV6_TLV_HAO 201 /* home address option */
>+#define IPV6_TLV_RPL 99 /* RFC 6553 */
>
> /*
> * IPV6 socket options
>diff --git a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
>index b636f1da9aec..82ed60d3180e 100644
>--- a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
>+++ b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
>@@ -785,6 +785,15 @@ static bool ipv6_hop_calipso(struct sk_buff *skb, int
>optoff)
> return false;
> }
>
>+/* RPL RFC 6553 */
>+
>+static bool ipv6_hop_rpl(struct sk_buff *skb, int optoff)
>+{
>+ /*Dump function which always return true
>+ *when rpl option is detected*/
This is definitelly wrong formatting of comment. Did you run checkpatch?
>+ return true;
>+}
>+
> static const struct tlvtype_proc tlvprochopopt_lst[] = {
> {
> .type = IPV6_TLV_ROUTERALERT,
>@@ -798,6 +807,10 @@ static const struct tlvtype_proc tlvprochopopt_lst[] = {
> .type = IPV6_TLV_CALIPSO,
> .func = ipv6_hop_calipso,
> },
>+ {
>+ .type = IPV6_TLV_RPL,
>+ .func = ipv6_hop_rpl,
>+ },
> { -1, }
> };
>
