From: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 19:39:33 -0700

> On 5/1/17 7:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> If the last BPF instruction before exit is a ldimm64, branches to the
>> exit point at the wrong location.
>>
>> Here is what I get from test_pkt_access.c on sparc:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <process>:
>>    0:        b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 02         mov     r0, 2
>>    8:        61 21 00 50 00 00 00 00         ldw     r2, [r1+80]
>>   10:        61 11 00 4c 00 00 00 00         ldw     r1, [r1+76]
>>   18:        bf 41 00 00 00 00 00 00         mov     r4, r1
>>   20:        07 40 00 00 00 00 00 0e         add     r4, 14
>>   28:        2d 42 00 25 00 00 00 00         jgt     r4, r2, 148 <LBB0_11>
>>  ...
>> 0000000000000148 <LBB0_11>:
>>  148:        18 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff         ldimm64 r0, 4294967295
>>  150:        00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>
>> 0000000000000158 <LBB0_12>:
>>  158:        95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00         exit    
>>
>> The offset field in the "jgt" instruction is 0x25 which multiplied by
>> 8 is 0x128, add 0x128 to the instruction location which is 0x28, and
>> we get 0x150, which is the second 64-bit chunk of the ldimm64
>> instruction.
> 
> looks fine to me. it jumps to 0x158,
> since offset 0 is the next insn after jump which is 0x30
> That's how classic bpf defined jumps.

Ok, let me first fix the binutils disassembler :-)

Reply via email to