On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:00:02PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > index 81ef53f..42bff22 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > @@ -3300,8 +3300,7 @@ void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> >
> > static inline void sw_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > - if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP &&
> > - !(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS))
> > + if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP)
> > skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL);
> > }
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -3874,6 +3874,10 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> > if (!sk)
> > return;
> >
> > + if (!hwtstamps && !(sk->sk_tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW)
> > &&
> > + skb_shinfo(orig_skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
> > + return;
> > +
>
> This check should only happen for software transmit timestamps, so simpler to
> revise the check in sw_tx_timestamp above to
>
> if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP &&
> - !(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS))
> + (!(skb_shinfo(orig_skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)) ||
> + (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW)
I'm not sure if this can work. sk_buff.h would need to include sock.h
in order to get the definition of struct sock. Any suggestions?
--
Miroslav Lichvar
