On 2017/04/25 10:54, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
[...]
> > > The call to memset was removed from the upstream kernel with:
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -----------------
> > > commit 5944701df90d9577658e2354cc27c4ceaeca30fe
> > > Author: stephen hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> > > Date: Fri Jan 6 19:12:53 2017 -0800
> > >
> > > net: remove useless memset's in drivers get_stats64
> > >
> > > In dev_get_stats() the statistic structure storage has already
> > > been
> > > zeroed. Therefore network drivers do not need to call memset()
> > > again.
> > > ...
> > > < changes to other drivers snipped out >
> > > ...
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/int
> > > index 723025b..79651eb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > > @@ -5925,7 +5925,6 @@ void e1000e_get_stats64(struct net_device
> > > *netdev,
> > > {
> > > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > >
> > > - memset(stats, 0, sizeof(struct rtnl_link_stats64));
> > > spin_lock(&adapter->stats64_lock);
> > > e1000e_update_stats(adapter);
> > > /* Fill out the OS statistics structure */
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -----------------
> > >
> > > This also is where the bad counters start to show up for e1000e for
> > > my test systems. From this driver on I see (very) large values for
> > > tx_dropped, rx_over_errors and tx_fifo_errors on driver load (even
> > > before bringing the interface up. It seems the memset is not so
> > > useless for this driver after all. Would simply reverting the e1000e
> > > portion of this patch resolve the issue?
> >
> > Looks like Aaron beat me to the punch on pointing out that we had this
> > very code in there before. It appears that Stephen's
> > assertion/assumption was incorrect about the stats structure being
> > zero'd out, which is why we are seeing the issue.
> >
> > I have no issue reverting Stephen's earlier patch, or do we want to
> > pursue why the stats structure is not zero'd out and resolve that
> > instead. Either way, just want to make sure we are all on the same
> > page as to the right solution so that we do not end up repeating this
> > in the future.
>
> Lets's fix this in the base code.
>
> From: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:50:19 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH net] net: always zero statistics
>
> Drivers with 32 bit statistics API also should get zeroed statistics.
>
> Fixes: 5944701df90d ("net: remove useless memset's in drivers get_stats64")This is probably a good change to do but it doesn't fix anything in 5944701df90d, especially not the problem with e1000e.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
