On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Erez Shitrit <ere...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> thanks for the info. Is this bug there since ipoib/bonding day one (and >> hence my bug...) >> or was indeed introduced later? if later, can you explain how >> fc791b633515 introduced that or you only know it by bisection? > commit "fc791b633515" changes the size of the dev_hardlen to be 24 and > required 24 extra bytes in the skb, before it was only 4, if skb is > aligned to eth "mode" it already has 14 bytes for hard-header. > So only after that commit we have the issue. If got you right, Paolo's commit introduced a regression, so we (I guess you and Paolo) need to either solve it or we (community) should consider a revert, please suggest. The bug is now in stable and distro kernels, so please act. Or.
