On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 04:25:43PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:44:59AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> > On 17-04-19 10:17 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:29:03AM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I ran this on top of a card that uses the bnxt_en driver on a desktop
> > >> class system with an i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz, sending a single stream of
> > >> UDP traffic with flow control disabled and saw the following (all stats
> > >> in Million PPS).
> > >>
> > >> xdp1 xdp2 xdp_tx_tunnel
> > >> Generic XDP 7.8 5.5 (1.3 actual) 4.6 (1.1 actual)
> > >> Optimized XDP 11.7 9.7 4.6
> > >
> > > Nice! Thanks for testing.
> > >
> > >> One thing to note is that the Generic XDP case shows some different
> > >> results for reported by the application vs actual (seen on the wire). I
> > >> did not debug where the drops are happening and what counter needs to be
> > >> incremented to note this -- I'll add that to my TODO list. The
> > >> Optimized XDP case does not have a difference in reported vs actual
> > >> frames on the wire.
> > >
> > > The missed packets are probably due to xmit queue being full.
> > > We need 'xdp_tx_full' counter in:
> > > + if (free_skb) {
> > > + trace_xdp_exception(dev, xdp_prog, XDP_TX);
> > > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > > + }
> > > like in-driver xdp does.
> > > It's surprising that tx becomes full so often. May be bnxt specific
> > > behavior?
> >
> > hmm as a data point I get better numbers than 1.3Mpps running through the
> > qdisc
> > layer with pktgen so seems like something is wrong with the driver perhaps?
> > If
>
> I get ~6.5Mpps on a single core with pktgen, so inconclusive for now....
may be your tx queue is simply smaller than rx queue?
