Hi,
Thank you for the comments.
>> Why not just use sscanf?
Here's a fixed version of the previous patch, that uses sscanf.
>
> Better yet, use a better interface like netlink rather than module
> parameters.
Wouldn't that be overkill?
best regards,
---
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Takata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.17.4/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2006-06-18
10:49:35.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.17.4-enhance-ipcheck/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
2006-07-12 17:20:39.000000000 +0900
@@ -4455,7 +4455,36 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond
arp_ip_count++) {
/* not complete check, but should be good enough to
catch mistakes */
- if (!isdigit(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count][0])) {
+ int ip1, ip2, ip3, ip4, notip = 0;
+ char dummy;
+
+ /* notip's number means error code for debug purpose */
+ do {
+ if (sscanf(arp_ip_target[arp_ip_count], "%d.%d.%d.%d%c",
+ &ip1, &ip2, &ip3, &ip4, &dummy)
!= 4) {
+ notip = 1;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ if (ip1 < 0 || ip1 > 255) {
+ notip = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (ip2 < 0 || ip2 > 255) {
+ notip = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (ip3 < 0 || ip3 > 255) {
+ notip = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (ip4 < 0 || ip4 > 255) {
+ notip = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ } while(0);
+
+ if (notip) {
printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_NAME
": Warning: bad arp_ip_target module parameter "
"(%s), ARP monitoring will not be performed\n",
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
