On Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 13:53:06 CEST Johannes Berg wrote:
[...]
> > Not sure whether removing it in ieee80211_propagate_queue_wake will
> > have other odd side effects with software queuing. Maybe Michal
> > Kazior can tell us if it is safe to remove it.
> 
> No, it's the other way around.
> 
> Michal's patches correctly added a test for this to
> __ieee80211_stop_queue(), the only missing thing is that this test
> should also be in ieee80211_do_open() like this:
> 
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/iface.c b/net/mac80211/iface.c
> index 40813dd3301c..5bb0c5012819 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/iface.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/iface.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,8 @@ int ieee80211_do_open(struct wireless_dev *wdev, bool 
> coming_up)
>       ieee80211_recalc_ps(local);
>  
>       if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR ||
> -         sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN) {
> +         sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN ||
> +         local->ops->wake_tx_queue) {
>               /* XXX: for AP_VLAN, actually track AP queues */
>               netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev);
>       } else if (dev) {

Yes, this also works.

Kind regards,
        Sven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to