On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Andrey Konovalov
<andreyk...@google.com> wrote:
> When calculating po->tp_hdrlen + po->tp_reserve the result can overflow.
>
> Fix by checking that tp_reserve <= INT_MAX on assign.
>
> This also takes cared of an overflow when calculating
>  macoff = TPACKET_ALIGN(po->tp_hdrlen) + 16 + po->tp_reserve
>  snaplen = skb->len
>  macoff + snaplen
> since macoff ~ INT_MAX and snaplen < SKB_MAX_ALLOC.

This refers to the overflow of macoff + snaplen?

Note that macoff is unsigned short, so will truncate any overflow from
tp_reserve.

> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@google.com>
> ---
>  net/packet/af_packet.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index c5c43fff8c01..28b49749d1af 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -3665,6 +3665,8 @@ packet_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int 
> optname, char __user *optv
>                         return -EBUSY;
>                 if (copy_from_user(&val, optval, sizeof(val)))
>                         return -EFAULT;
> +               if (val > INT_MAX)
> +                       return -EINVAL;

This change on its own is sufficient to avoid the overflow. For net
and backports to stable, this minimal patch is preferable.

>                 po->tp_reserve = val;
>                 return 0;
>         }
> @@ -4200,6 +4202,8 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union 
> tpacket_req_u *req_u,
>                 if (unlikely((u64)req->tp_block_size * req->tp_block_nr >
>                                         UINT_MAX))
>                         goto out;
> +               if (unlikely(po->tp_reserve >= req->tp_frame_size))
> +                       goto out;
>
>                 if (unlikely(!PAGE_ALIGNED(req->tp_block_size)))
>                         goto out;
> @@ -4207,9 +4211,6 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union 
> tpacket_req_u *req_u,
>                     req->tp_block_size <=
>                           BLK_PLUS_PRIV((u64)req_u->req3.tp_sizeof_priv))
>                         goto out;
> -               if (unlikely(req->tp_frame_size < po->tp_hdrlen +
> -                                       po->tp_reserve))
> -                       goto out;

Is there a reason that the test is moved up? It is probably not
correct to remove tp_hdrlen from the test.

>                 if (unlikely(req->tp_frame_size & (TPACKET_ALIGNMENT - 1)))
>                         goto out;
>
> --
> 2.12.2.564.g063fe858b8-goog
>

Reply via email to