Às 10:09 AM de 3/27/2017, Corentin Labbe escreveu: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Joao Pinto wrote: >> Às 7:26 AM de 3/25/2017, Corentin Labbe escreveu: >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:16:45PM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote: >>>> For cores that have more than 1 TX queue configured, the kernel would >>>> crash, >>>> since only one TX queue is permitted by default. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpi...@synopsys.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c >>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c >>>> index 3827952..1eab084 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c >>>> @@ -3429,7 +3429,7 @@ static int stmmac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int >>>> budget) >>>> struct stmmac_rx_queue *rx_q = >>>> container_of(napi, struct stmmac_rx_queue, napi); >>>> struct stmmac_priv *priv = rx_q->priv_data; >>>> - u32 tx_count = priv->dma_cap.number_tx_queues; >>>> + u32 tx_count = priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use; >>>> u32 chan = rx_q->queue_index; >>>> u32 work_done = 0; >>>> u32 queue = 0; >>>> -- >>>> 2.9.3 >>>> >>> >>> This patch fix the performance issue on dwmac-sun8i only. >> >> Ok, great! >> > > Sorry, in the we, I see that my gigabit dwmac-sun8i didnt work... (but didnt > have time to find why). > >>> The dwmac-sunxi is still broken.
Ok, let's see what others report. >>> >> >> What is the difference between the setups? > > dwmac-sun8i use chain mode, dwmac-sunxi use ring mode > @Thierry and Niklas: Hi! Your setup is working well with these 2 fix patches? Thnaks.
