On 03/13/2017 03:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Arcari <darc...@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:50:50 -0400
>
>> On 03/13/2017 02:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: David Arcari <darc...@redhat.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0500
>>>
>>>> When the aquantia device mtu is changed the net_device structure is not
>>>> updated. As a result the ip command does not properly reflect the mtu
>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> Commit 5513e16421cb incorrectly assumed that __dev_set_mtu() was making the
>>>> assignment ndev->mtu = new_mtu; This is not true in the case where the
>>>> driver
>>>> has a ndo_change_mtu routine.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 5513e16421cb ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Fixes for
>>>> aq_ndev_change_mtu")
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Pavel Belous <pavel.bel...@aquantia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Arcari <darc...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I see that my patch:
>>
>> "net: ethernet: aquantia: call set_irq_affinity_hint before free_irq"
>>
>> has been applied to net, but I don't see that this patch has been applied.
>
> It is marked as "changes requested" in patchwork, because you were asked to
> do the restart label removal in a separate patch.
>
Sorry, I was not clear. I was trying to ask if your "Applied, thanks" reply
(above) was meant for this email thread. I believe it was meant for the
set_irq_affinity_hint patch.
Thanks,
-DA
