On 10/03/17 02:54, David Ahern wrote:
On 3/7/17 5:46 PM, Robert Shearman wrote:
@@ -78,6 +70,29 @@ static int mpls_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
tun_encap_info = mpls_lwtunnel_encap(dst->lwtstate);
+ /* Obtain the ttl */
+ if (dst->ops->family == AF_INET) {
+ if (tun_encap_info->ttl_propagate == MPLS_TTL_PROP_DISABLED)
+ ttl = tun_encap_info->default_ttl;
+ else if (tun_encap_info->ttl_propagate == MPLS_TTL_PROP_DEFAULT
&&
+ !net->mpls.ip_ttl_propagate)
+ ttl = net->mpls.default_ttl;
+ else
+ ttl = ip_hdr(skb)->ttl;
After staring at that for a while, an explanation above this if {} else
{} section on the ttl selection will be very helpful.
Ok, would a comment like the following improve things sufficiently?
/* Obtain the ttl using the following set of rules.
*
* LWT ttl propagation setting:
* - disabled => use default TTL value from LWT
* - enabled => use TTL value from IPv4/IPv6 header
* - default =>
* Global ttl propagation setting:
* - disabled => use default TTL value from global setting
* - enabled => use TTL value from IPv4/IPv6 header
*/
Thanks,
Rob