From: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:51:34 +0000
> David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > >> I guess this is fine, but I think you can use one of the two "sk_padding" >> bits in struct sock instead of making the structure larger. > > It shouldn't make the structure larger since there's a hole in the structure: ... > u16 sk_gso_max_segs; > ---> 2-byte hole here > unsigned long sk_lingertime; > > but I'll quite happily shift it to sk_padding. Ok, then that's fine.
