>> >> Gosh. Can we also replace this BUG() into something less aggressive ? > > > There are currently 5 of these WARN() + BUG() constructs and 1 BUG()-only > for the 'default' TPACKET version spread all over af_packet, so probably > makes sense to rather make all of them less aggressive. > >
Very few consumers actually go looking in the kernel logs to see the error-warnings and report them back here. This severity will get them to report the incident which in this case got fixed??
